For the Milwaukee Police Department and Fire and Police Commission
Chapter 5
Use of Force and Deadly Force Practices
Finding 20
MPD does not provide specific direction for supervisors for obtaining videos for the Use of Force Report and investigation, whether from the vehicle, body camera, surrounding businesses, or other places.
MPD should update its policy to require obtaining videos, including specific direction for all types of video if available.
In 2013, fields were added in the AIM System’s Use of Force report, specifically addressing whether or not there was video evidence related to an incident, and if so, the name of the supervisor(s) who reviewed the video. In 2013, the collection and review of video evidence for use of force incidents was and continues to be addressed with all new supervisors at supervisory development training. It should be noted SOP 460.35(D)(1)(c) clearly states under the specific directions for completing the Use of Force report in the “details” field to “Indicate if video or audio was available and the name of the supervisor who reviewed the video. An electronic (CD/DVD) copy of the video should be forwarded to IAD.”
In addition, SOP 730.15(A)(2)(Mobile Digital Audio / Recording (MVDR) Equipment) and SOP 747.25(G)(2) (Body Worn Cameras) clearly articulates how members are to ensure video evidence is properly retained. Supervisory review and approval is required for Use of Force reports and SOP 460.035(B)(2-7) clearly articulates the extensive approval process for Use of Force reports as they are reviewed by several layers of supervision.
* Email or Phone:
Body cameras should be on at all times. The film should be made public if a questionable event occurred.